tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post6030279992796951591..comments2023-04-13T17:22:30.695+01:00Comments on Confessions of a Cult Girl | Ahmadiyya: The Sunday Scandal Session 14: Wife of Nasser Khan Convicted of Perjury!Findingshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comBlogger221125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-79118615780056972262012-02-06T18:20:12.057+00:002012-02-06T18:20:12.057+00:00http://spa.qibla.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&ID=20...http://spa.qibla.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&ID=203&CATE=13<br /><br />The Impermissibility of Backbiting a Non-Muslim<br />Answer:<br />In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful<br /><br />Assalamu alaikum,<br /><br />Imam al-Barkawi mentions in his al-Tariqa al-Muhammadiyya that backbiting (ghiba) is, "To mention the faults of your brother, if he is specified and known to the person addressed."<br /><br />Sayyidi Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi comments,<br /><br />" the faults, " that is, the blameworthy traits and shortcomings, or that which he dislikes.<br /><br />"your brother," in humanity, even if a non-believer (kafir)... it is stated in Tanwir al-Absar... that it is necessary to avoid hurting him, and it is impermissible (haram) to backbite him, just as a Muslim.<br /><br />[Sayyidi Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi, al-Hadiqa al-Nadiyya Sharh al-Tariqa al-Muhammadiyya, 2: 218]<br /><br />Wassalam,<br /><br />Faraz Rabbani<br /><br />maybe you can start backbiting against the guy who wrote this as he clearly can't be a Muslim with these heretical views and he must have openly declared war on Allah and his Messenger. Try not to get too carried away in your rabid hating too much. Findings maybe a quiet word with your Mad Mullah BrotherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-9096254691056341852012-02-05T13:35:12.826+00:002012-02-05T13:35:12.826+00:00Because he is not an MP and has no moral character...Because he is not an MP and has no moral character to step-downAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-45067002155550786682012-02-05T01:39:34.625+00:002012-02-05T01:39:34.625+00:00You are badly mistaken comparing with huhne he is ...You are badly mistaken comparing with huhne he is still a man with character that he stepped down compare them with corrupt zardari and his tola who have no shame at all RAF & co are reflection of zardari unholy beasts on the earthAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-34140951991124500802012-02-04T16:37:07.093+00:002012-02-04T16:37:07.093+00:00Things like this just makes me even more sure I ma...Things like this just makes me even more sure I made the right decision a few years ago to leave the Jamaat, and now some in my family are also considering leaving Ahmadiyya...well they already left spiritually. Mashallah.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-3309691519378115472012-02-04T10:16:34.362+00:002012-02-04T10:16:34.362+00:00Whats the point lol. They are going to blame whoev...Whats the point lol. They are going to blame whoever they want, whenever they want. No evidence. Just on the say so of idiot Jamaat officials and a few minor coincidences. And of course, they love to sniff around ex Ahmadis/people who have left/been expelled... apparently they have more of a reason to be me! Lol if only they knew. The longer you are on the inside, the more likely you are to turn... thats exactly what happened. They are always looking in the wrong places. Nas Khan knows me very well. We go way back. I know his kids very well too. ;)Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-37969830486783525642012-02-04T10:14:13.068+00:002012-02-04T10:14:13.068+00:00RENEGADE NUMBER 1!!RENEGADE NUMBER 1!!Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-54822836002430510732012-02-04T10:09:47.445+00:002012-02-04T10:09:47.445+00:00The counseling is because the saved sect of Allah ...The counseling is because the saved sect of Allah is being hammered by record divorce rates. It is preparing kids for marriage. Fozia Khan is the main counselor. LOL. says it all eh?!?Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-34744129327366873072012-02-03T14:08:04.480+00:002012-02-03T14:08:04.480+00:00@ All the people who thinks this is a storm in a t...@ All the people who thinks this is a storm in a tea cup<br /><br /> Under oath she took the name of Allah (S.W.T) and his Messenger (S.A.W) with utter disregard and utter contempt.<br /><br />THIS IS A BIG DEAL. She spoke a falsehood claiming that Allah (SWT) and his messenger(SAW) bear witness to the fact she is speaking the truth. <br /><br />If we are all agreed that this is a fact, then we can also agree that lying under oath is a bid deal, even thought the act of speeding may not be deemed as such a big deal.<br /><br />I don't understand why you can't comprehend this simple logical agruement......hence positions held by these two in the community have be compromised.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-83376504523790931222012-02-03T13:45:31.121+00:002012-02-03T13:45:31.121+00:00So have you warned the girl the jamaat think is fi...So have you warned the girl the jamaat think is findings?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-85064358774311582932012-02-03T13:24:33.405+00:002012-02-03T13:24:33.405+00:00Step down - this man should be kicked out for all ...Step down - this man should be kicked out for all the disgrace he brings on the Jamaat and Huzoor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-66743431907522682922012-02-03T13:22:00.521+00:002012-02-03T13:22:00.521+00:00'Allah's jamaat' is being run by disho...'Allah's jamaat' is being run by dishonest people with no integrity or morals. These jokers represent 'True' Islam.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-47585877392219364452012-02-03T13:01:39.285+00:002012-02-03T13:01:39.285+00:00Oh my Allah I just realised who you areOh my Allah I just realised who you areAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-45967490614761889892012-02-03T13:01:22.515+00:002012-02-03T13:01:22.515+00:00Latest news on MP Huhne
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news...Latest news on MP Huhne<br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16866127<br /><br />Take note Nas,Fozia,Raf and Masroor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-63715050008556757202012-02-03T11:46:25.491+00:002012-02-03T11:46:25.491+00:00@Findings, you are like the Jamaat Gossip Girl
Ha...@Findings, you are like the Jamaat Gossip Girl<br /><br />Hahah<br /><br />xoxoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-14763701451269443292012-02-03T11:28:08.933+00:002012-02-03T11:28:08.933+00:00So Chris Huhne resigned. Will this naib-Ameer of &...So Chris Huhne resigned. Will this naib-Ameer of "Allah's Jamaat" also do the right thing and step down? I highly doubt it... too much money at stake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-74882012926628946122012-02-03T11:20:37.003+00:002012-02-03T11:20:37.003+00:00Now look how the almost identical Chris Huhne case...Now look how the almost identical Chris Huhne case has been dealt with. This guy has to step down from his position for asking his wife to take his penalty points. IT'S A SERIOUS OFFENCE and recognised by the law and carries penalties. NOW WHAT are the Divine Jamaat leaders Mirza Masroor and Rafiq Hayat who talk about Truth and Justice and Loyalty etc etc etc going to do about this. Let me guess......Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-6560990166393080302012-02-03T09:15:51.024+00:002012-02-03T09:15:51.024+00:00Let's stick to the topic. It's irrelevant ...Let's stick to the topic. It's irrelevant if Ahmadis are considered Non-Muslim because they themselves think themselves to be TRUE Islam and TRUE Muslims. Well if that's the case why are they happy to have liars and con men as part of their Khalifa chosen administration team.<br />Why do they not remove these fraudulent characters. They are publicly making a mockery of themselves and showing themselves to be TRUE Hypocrites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-44358113814730547412012-02-03T09:03:19.190+00:002012-02-03T09:03:19.190+00:00Hey Sunni CONvert GUESS WHO MY MULLAH IS ....... A...Hey Sunni CONvert GUESS WHO MY MULLAH IS ....... Any ideas????<br /> Mirza Masroor Ahmad - Head of the World Wide Ahmadiyya Community, Leader of 200 million Ahmadis world wide. <br />That's right arsehole. I got the same Mullah as you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-66938699576881844812012-02-03T07:47:12.216+00:002012-02-03T07:47:12.216+00:00'Now ignoring the rest of your subjective nons...'Now ignoring the rest of your subjective nonsense which was below this lets be realistic. The last comment "They are those who will be like me and my companions". Now its patently obvious that most groups will claim to be this group and the statement is vague enough to make it easily applicable. Your interpretation may be correct or then again The Islam-Ahmadiyyat one may be correct as they have Khilafat which was amongst the companions of the Holy Prophet PBUH. Allah knows best. More importantly he says 72 sects will be in the fire and one will be saved and the Ummah will ape/copy the jews, to me this implies that the vast majority will be in the wrong. If this Hadith only implies to 5% of Muslims and 95% will be on the correct path what would be the point of mentioning 72/73 sects. Lets look at what Jews expected from their Messiah:'<br /><br />FOR ANY OF THE GROUPS TO CLAIM TO BE THE SAVED SECT THEIR ACTIONS MUST RESEMBLE THOSE OF THE PROPHET PBUH AND THE COMPANIONS.<br /><br />I ASKED YOU TO GIVE ME ONE EXAMPLE FROM ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE WHERE THEY BELIEVED THAT THE FINAL PROPHET PBUH WAS NOT FINAL.<br /><br />THAT IN AND OFF ITSELF IS ENOUGH TO TELL ALL THAT YOU CERTAINLY ARE NOT THE SAVED SECT ON THE CONTRARY THERE ARE MANY NARRATIONS WHICH STATE THAT ANYBODY THAT HOLDS SUCH HERETICAL BELIEFS ARE NON-MUSLIMS.<br /><br />THIS IS WHY THE MUSLIM SCHOLARS HAVE UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT ANYBODY WITH THISE BELIEFS IS A NON-MUSLIM!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-29826223193123041182012-02-03T07:43:18.965+00:002012-02-03T07:43:18.965+00:00ALL QADIANI'S PLEASE PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION ...ALL QADIANI'S PLEASE PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE ABOVE WHERE IT STATES<br /><br />'this indicates that in the case of one who is not your brother, such as a Jew or a Christian or a follower of any other religion, or one whose bid’ah has put him beyond the pale of Islam, there is no backbiting in his case.” <br /><br />AS SHOULD BE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR BY NOW YOU WITH THOSE BELIEFS OF MGA BEING A PROPHET ARE NOT OUR BROTHERS. RATHER YOU ARE FOLLOWERS OF ANOTHER RELIGION AND IN THIS CASE THE BACKBITING CARD CAN NOT BE PLAYED. I WOULD LIKE TO THINK THAT I HAVE PUT THAT WHOLE BACKBITING NONSENSE TO BED NOW.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-14437947499876616582012-02-03T07:40:07.652+00:002012-02-03T07:40:07.652+00:00Ahmad ibn Hajar al-Haythami said in al-Zawaajir ‘a...Ahmad ibn Hajar al-Haythami said in al-Zawaajir ‘an Iqtiraaf al-Kabaa’ir (vol. 2, p. 27): “Al-Ghazaali was asked about backbiting about a kaafir. He said: with regard to a Muslim, it is forbidden for three reasons: causing offence; criticizing the creation of Allaah, for Allaah is the Creator of the deeds of His slaves; and wasting time in something that is of no benefit. The first is haraam, the second is makrooh, and the third is not the best thing that one can do. With regard to the dhimmi, he is like the Muslim as far as not harming him is concerned, because the Lawgiver protects his honour, blood and property. It was said in al-Khaadim, the first view is correct. Ibn Hibbaan narrated in his Saheeh that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, ‘Whoever makes a snide comment to a Jew or a Christian deserves Hell.’ The meaning of making a snide comment is to make someone hear something that will cause offence to him. There is no stronger evidence than this, i.e., it is haraam. Al-Ghazaali said: with regard to the harbi, the former is not haraam, and the second and third are makrooh. With regard to one who commits bid’ah (innovation), if he is becomes a kaafir thereby, then he is like a harbi, otherwise he is like a Muslim, but speaking of him with regard to his bid’ah is not makrooh. Ibn al-Mundhir said, concerning the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), “It is your mentioning about your brother that which he dislikes,” – this indicates that in the case of one who is not your brother, such as a Jew or a Christian or a follower of any other religion, or one whose bid’ah has put him beyond the pale of Islam, there is no backbiting in his case.”Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-36601435682496092462012-02-03T07:39:11.153+00:002012-02-03T07:39:11.153+00:00There follow some of the comments of the scholars ...There follow some of the comments of the scholars on this topic: (BACKBITING)<br /><br /> Zakariya al-Ansaari said: “Backbiting about a kaafir is haraam if he is a dhimmi [a non-Muslim living under Islamic rule], because that puts them off from accepting the jizyah and it is going against the treaty of dhimmah (agreement between non-Muslim subjects and the Islamic state) and the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). ‘Whoever makes a snide comment to a dhimmi has earned Hell.’ (Narrated by Ibn Hibbaan in his Saheeh). <br /><br />(ANY ONE RATIONAL WILL SEE THE ABOVE DOES NOT APPLY TO THE AHMADI'S)<br /><br />It is permissible (to backbite about a kaafir) if he is a harbi (one who is at war with the Muslims), because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to command Hassaan to lampoon the mushrikeen.”<br /><br />(Asna al-Mutaalib ma’a Haashiyatihi, vol. 3, p. 116)<br /><br />(EVERY ONE RATIONAL CAN SEE THAT THE ABOVE APPLIES TO THE AHMADI'S AS THEY ARE CLEARLY AT WAR WITH THE MUSLIMS WITH REGARDS TO THEIR HERETICAL BELIEFS)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-21385910274648986562012-02-03T07:36:56.233+00:002012-02-03T07:36:56.233+00:00It is not a Muslim characteristic to speak rudely....It is not a Muslim characteristic to speak rudely. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The Muslim does not slander, curse, speak obscenely or speak rudely.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, who said, this is a ghareeb hasan hadeeth; it was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani). Whoever does a thing a lot, it will become his habit, so the Muslim should keep away from all the ways that lead to evil, whether minor or major. Whoever drives his sheep near the enclosure of the king is bound to cross the line. <br /><br />If you backbite about a kaafir by mentioning his physical defects, such as his having a long nose or a big mouth, etc., then do not do this, because this is making fun of the creation of Allaah. If it means talking about his bad characteristics which he flaunts openly, such as zina and immorality, or drinking alcohol, and warning against him, there is nothing wrong with that. <br /><br />(I THINK YOU WILL FIND THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ON THIS BLOG ARE DOING BECAUSE YOUR FALSE PROPHET AND ALL HIS FOLLOWERS OPENLY FLAUNT DEVIANT AND HERETICAL BELIEFS AND WE ARE MERELY WARING AGAINST THEM, THEREFORE NOT BACKBITING)<br /><br />There follow some of the comments of the scholars on this topic:<br /><br /> Zakariya al-Ansaari said: “Backbiting about a kaafir is haraam if he is a dhimmi [a non-Muslim living under Islamic rule], because that puts them off from accepting the jizyah and it is going against the treaty of dhimmah (agreement between non-Muslim subjects and the Islamic state) and the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). ‘Whoever makes a snide comment to a dhimmi has earned Hell.’ (Narrated by Ibn Hibbaan in his Saheeh). It is permissible (to backbite about a kaafir) if he is a harbi (one who is at war with the Muslims), because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to command Hassaan to lampoon the mushrikeen.”<br /><br />(Asna al-Mutaalib ma’a Haashiyatihi, vol. 3, p. 116)<br /><br /> Ahmad ibn Hajar al-Haythami said in al-Zawaajir ‘an Iqtiraaf al-Kabaa’ir (vol. 2, p. 27): “Al-Ghazaali was asked about backbiting about a kaafir. He said: with regard to a Muslim, it is forbidden for three reasons: causing offence; criticizing the creation of Allaah, for Allaah is the Creator of the deeds of His slaves; and wasting time in something that is of no benefit. The first is haraam, the second is makrooh, and the third is not the best thing that one can do. With regard to the dhimmi, he is like the Muslim as far as not harming him is concerned, because the Lawgiver protects his honour, blood and property. It was said in al-Khaadim, the first view is correct. Ibn Hibbaan narrated in his Saheeh that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, ‘Whoever makes a snide comment to a Jew or a Christian deserves Hell.’ The meaning of making a snide comment is to make someone hear something that will cause offence to him. There is no stronger evidence than this, i.e., it is haraam. Al-Ghazaali said: with regard to the harbi, the former is not haraam, and the second and third are makrooh. With regard to one who commits bid’ah (innovation), if he is becomes a kaafir thereby, then he is like a harbi, otherwise he is like a Muslim, but speaking of him with regard to his bid’ah is not makrooh. Ibn al-Mundhir said, concerning the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), “It is your mentioning about your brother that which he dislikes,” – this indicates that in the case of one who is not your brother, such as a Jew or a Christian or a follower of any other religion, or one whose bid’ah has put him beyond the pale of Islam, there is no backbiting in his case.”Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-63599988467267775732012-02-03T07:30:31.015+00:002012-02-03T07:30:31.015+00:00There is no gheebah in the case of a faasiq (an ev...There is no gheebah in the case of a faasiq (an evildoer who openly commits sins) is indicated by the proven report which says that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) saw a funeral passing by, and those who were with him spoke ill of the deceased person, and he (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) said: “It is due.” Then another funeral passed by, and they spoke well of the deceased person, and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) said: “It is due.” They asked him what he had meant by saying it is due, and he said: “The one of whom you spoke ill, Hell is his due, and the one of whom you spoke well, Paradise is his due. You are the witnesses of Allaah on His earth.” and he did not rebuke them for speaking ill of the deceased person of whose evildoing they were aware. This indicates that if a person commits evil openly, there is no gheebah in his case. <br /><br />The above evidence shows the permissibility of backbiting a person who openly commits evil. If this is permissible then what then of NON-MUSLIMS such as Ahmadi's who do not fall into the faasiq category but the worse category of kaafir!<br /><br />I would say this too is also permissible due the benefit of highlighting their faults and pulling people out of their cult.<br /><br />So you see twisted Qadiani I am not making anything up I have evidences for all that I say and do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-10115176138366945042012-02-03T07:27:11.969+00:002012-02-03T07:27:11.969+00:00Gheebah is haraam and emphatically so, because All...Gheebah is haraam and emphatically so, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):<br /><br />“neither backbite one another. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother?”<br /><br />[al-Hujuraat 49:12]. <br /><br />And it is proven from Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) said: “When I was taken up into heaven, I was taken past some people who had nails of copper with which they were scratching their faces and chests. I said: Who are these, O Jibreel? He said: These are the ones who ate the flesh of the people and impugned their honour.” Narrated by Imam Ahmad and Abu Dawood with a saheeh isnaad. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) defined gheebah as saying about your brother that which he dislikes. <br /><br />It is permissible in a few cases which are indicated by shar’i evidence when there is a need for that, such as if someone consults you with regard to marriage or business partnership, or if someone complains to the ruler and asks him to put a stop to a person's wrongdoing. In that case there is nothing wrong with saying about him things that he dislikes for the purpose of serving an obvious interest. One of them compiled a list of the cases in which gheebah is permissible in two lines of verse in which he said: <br /><br />Criticism is not gheebah in six cases: complaining about mistreatment (like most people on here are doing), identifying a person, warning about a person (which is what all of us are doing against the Ahmadi's), highlighting evildoing (which is what all Ahmadi's with deviant beliefs engage in), seeking a fatwa, and seeking help to remove an evil (which Ahmadiyya is and we all want to help remove).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com