tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post982048008779266376..comments2023-04-13T17:22:30.695+01:00Comments on Confessions of a Cult Girl | Ahmadiyya: Jamaat Ahmadiyya: A Fabricated Hadith, A Challenge and An Epic Failure!!Findingshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comBlogger107125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-42149943160386586912012-03-07T08:31:46.126+00:002012-03-07T08:31:46.126+00:00@sister findings.
really good work,qadiyani can ne...@sister findings.<br />really good work,qadiyani can never answer your challenge.<br />another interesting thread which proves mgaq a big liar.<br /><br />http://z8.invisionfree.com/forumz1835/index.php?showtopic=4406Salman Ahmadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-3484020390689107642012-02-07T23:48:20.663+00:002012-02-07T23:48:20.663+00:00what is wrong with this person?
you said, i quote,...what is wrong with this person?<br />you said, i quote, 'and consider that maybe, just maybe, there are even da'eef ahadith out there that state what he claims....we are even willing to settle for that too'<br /><br />and hen when confronted about it you said this, 'Also.. I've ALWAYS maintained I want a SAHIH Hadith as per the writings of your Mirza.. so please don't make crap up by saying I change my words.'<br /><br />You're confusedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-50057882053322082442011-11-07T03:51:28.038+00:002011-11-07T03:51:28.038+00:00@Seek4Truth
Thanks for sharing. So he was meant t...@Seek4Truth<br /><br />Thanks for sharing. So he was meant to pave way for Dajjal (Maitreya).If Prophet Muhammad(saw) had not painted bad picture of Dajjal or had asked us to seek ALLAH's refuge from curse of Dajjal - our Punjabi Messih would not have hesitated to claim that title also. He invainly tried to break the Seal of Prophet but could not mislead Muslims except very few.<br /><br />I know one simple logic from Quran. All mankind is divided in to two categories - Hizb ALLAH & Hizb Shaiytan. All Hizb Shaiytan have a common cause and they are united to defeat people obedient to ALLAH. <br /><br />So the game is on. Let Dajjal also come and join them. This life is only a Test. The "success" here is not the "real success". Hizb Shaitan seems "strong and succeeding" at the moment as majority of people assuming themselves under the banner of Hizb ALLAH are either dormant or lost the right track.<br /><br />Whereas Hizb Shaytan is very organized and pursuing their Goals very effectively. This will continue until Muslims (Hizb ALLAH) will not wake up and start playing its designated Role - Guide people to Righteousness - but before they have to walk on Righteousness path. <br /><br />Until they will not, Shaytan will use Cults like Ahmadiyya to mislead mankind and keep than in Chaos.<br /><br />Imam Mehdi will not come to rescue those Muslims who are naming their sacrifical animals in the names of Indian actors and whose marriage functions present all from which ALLAH's Rasool stopped us. <br /><br />Yes, the Islam they believe is true Islam and not a distorted version like of Qadianis - but it is not in their life.<br /><br />In a nutshell, Islam of Muhammad Rasool ALLAH is perfect but Muslims may have all the imperfections.<br /><br />That does not justify the need of a False Prophet like Mirza Ghulam to "correct the Islam". Some real Mujaddids (not one - many) like of Ali Hajveri are required to "correct Muslims". Islam is "perfect" from day one and it will stay "perfect" until the last day. No new prophet or new modifications in Islam are required. <br /><br />So MGAQ will be a BIG NO for all Muslims till the end even they are victimized by this Hizb Shaytan in which Ahmadiyya Cult is an active member. <br /><br />Thank you again as you prompted me to write this. <br /><br />MohsinAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-1888697593675415412011-11-06T21:18:07.632+00:002011-11-06T21:18:07.632+00:00@Mohsin
Have a look at this site:
http://www.cep...@Mohsin<br /><br />Have a look at this site:<br /><br />http://www.cephasministry.com/nwo_maitraya_freemasonry.html<br /><br />Seek4TruthAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-55935034143114319672011-11-06T20:05:45.364+00:002011-11-06T20:05:45.364+00:00Their "dream" was to convert most of Mus...Their "dream" was to convert most of Muslims to Qadianiat and make their own government of what they call Ahmadiyya Islam. Yes, they were loyal to British Government to have their support - administrative & financial - to achieve their targets. <br /><br />But I doubt they would have joined or supported Free Masons. There own Jammat was no less than a local version of Free Masons.<br /><br />Now they have realized, majority of Muslims will never join them so their enmity and hostility towards Muslims have reached to a point where they will conspire with any one from an Institution or Governments to teach a lesson for not believing their Promised Messiah (I call him Punjabi Messih). They will leave no chance to inflict wounds on Muslims as whole and Pakistani Muslims in particular.<br /><br />So your suspicions have some weight. We need to be very careful of them.<br /><br />They are the ones because of we lost Gurdaspur - and in result Kashmir. I hope you are aware how it happened. if not, read here<br /><br />http://ahmediorg.yuku.com/topic/3925/Mirza-Mahmud-Ahmad-was-against-Creation-of-PAKISTAN?page=1#.TrboEPTDVGU<br /><br /><br />http://irshad.org/info_m/news/takb1297.php<br /><br />MohsinAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-33154165783637057092011-11-06T15:27:11.575+00:002011-11-06T15:27:11.575+00:00That is one of the points of me questioning Mirza ...That is one of the points of me questioning Mirza Ghulam, he says that we should obey the British government, but why would Allah say that to him when during that time most of the prime ministers of Britain were members of the secret society and some politicians of today are too. I guess not many people from the Ahmadi jamaat know about secret societies, free masonary! <br /><br />I personaly think Masoor (Khalifa) is a free mason and so was his master Gulam Mirza. These secret society's can be very brutal to their opponents as we have seen many past examples of their wickedness i.e. Malcolm X, Tupac, JFK and many others.<br /><br />May Allah protect sister findings and show all Qadiyanis the right path.<br /><br />AmeenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-43943776290147804122011-11-06T14:36:56.438+00:002011-11-06T14:36:56.438+00:00Do you beleive in secret society's such as Fre...Do you beleive in secret society's such as Free Masons and Illuminati?<br />------------------------------------------------<br /><br />That is one of the points of me questioning Mirza Ghulam, he says that we should obey the British government, but why would Allah say that to him when during that time most of the prime ministers of Britain were members of the secret society and some politicians of today are too. I guess not many people from the Ahmadi jamaat know about secret societies, free masonary!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-17474293634428801852011-11-06T12:27:06.371+00:002011-11-06T12:27:06.371+00:00Office bearers often use tazeer to set their own e...Office bearers often use tazeer to set their own ego centric scores and punish disgrace innocent ahnadis and ask them letters of apologies yo fil files no sense of any spititualism behind this free masonismAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-70065724064513947312011-11-06T00:49:43.714+00:002011-11-06T00:49:43.714+00:00The mostn unislamic and cursed system of ahmadi is...The mostn unislamic and cursed system of ahmadi is restrictions excommunications they must stop they are playing with fire respects of humzn beings destroying their reputation and family livesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-12457460845834579862011-11-05T20:48:30.113+00:002011-11-05T20:48:30.113+00:00@Findings
Do you beleive in secret society's...@Findings <br /><br />Do you beleive in secret society's such as Free Masons and Illuminati?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-14853823349115956322011-10-28T14:55:57.294+01:002011-10-28T14:55:57.294+01:00Thanks for your civil reply platosnores. I refer t...Thanks for your civil reply platosnores. I refer to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a liar, not just based on this specific issue, but on many issues. Which insha'Allah I will address in the coming weeks. But for now lets take your stance and look at his writings as a whole then shall we with regards to the issue of these ahadith?<br /><br />Your argument is that Mirza is building a case from multiple hadiths and inferring that the Messiah will come at the start of the 14th Century.<br /><br />Well.. well.. well.. it seems you're actually arguing against your own Prophet! I refer you to the following quote:<br /><br />“And as to Ahadith about the arrival of Mahdi you know they are all Da’if and problematic contradicting one another so much so that in one narration in Ibn Majah and other books says, ‘There is no Mahdi except ‘Eisa, so how can one rest his case on such kind of narrations with so much difference and contradictions, weakness and criticism on their narrators, as is not hidden from the scholars of Hadith?”<br /><br />(Humamtul Bushra pp.148-149 included in Rohani Khazain vol.7 pp.314-315)<br /><br />It can be found on page 150/151 of that actual pdf here:<br /><br />http://www.alislam.org/urdu/rkold/rk-7-21.pdf<br /><br />Are you actually trying to argue that Mirza is building a case based on the very hadith that he himself said are "Da’if and problematic contradicting one another" and then goes on to say that "how can one rest is his case on such kind of narrations with so much difference and contradictions"?<br /><br />I'd also like to remind you that all his Arabic writings are 'ilhami' as in Sirat al-Mahdi vol.1 p.91 Mirza Bashir Ahmad on the authority of Maulvi Sher Ali quotes Mirza to have said that all his Arabic writings are only a kind of revelation.<br /><br />So you see, you're in a no-win situation. Mirza's writings are soo contradictory and full of opposing views that if you argue one way you're actually gonna end up arguing against him :)Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-83961061229287194522011-10-28T14:22:46.484+01:002011-10-28T14:22:46.484+01:00platosnores said..."You know, when these ecli...platosnores said..."You know, when these eclipses happened as per the hadith, many people accepted the truth of HMGA and shed tears, because they were already aware of this particular sign."<br /><br />Your Mirza twisted Quran's verses and Hadith texts to prove his false nabuwat (prophethood)<br /><br />Mirza Ghulam himself had written:<br />"One Hadith of Dar-e-Qatni also proves that the Promised Mahdi will appear at the head of 14th Century; and that hadith is this ....translation of the whole hadith is:<br />'There are two signs of our Mahdi; since the creation of earth and heaven this sign has not been revealed for any appointed and prophet and messenger; and those signs are that moon will eclipse in the first night "of its fixed nights" of eclipse and sun will get eclipsed in the middle "of the fixed days" for its eclipse, during the month of Ramadhan.' <br /><br />...this hadith clearly fixes 14th Century." (Roohani Khazain, Vol. 17, P. 331)<br />However, the actual hadith recorded in Dar-e-Qatni clearly reads:<br /><br />Narrated Amr son of Shamir, quoting Jabir, who quoted Mohammad bin 'Ali:<br />"For our Mahdi, two signs are given which never occurred in the past from the creation of the heavens and the earth. One is that a lunar eclipse will occur on the first night of Ramadhan and the second sign is that a solar eclipse will occur in the middle of Ramadhan and these signs had never happened from the creation of the heavens and the earth." (Dar-e-Qatni, Vol. 1, P. 188)<br /><br />This saying clearly states that the lunar eclipse will happen in the beginning of the month of Ramadhan and the solar eclipse will occur in the middle of the month. However, this event is astronomically impossible and would be indeed miraculous if occurred.<br /><br /><br />The lunar and solar eclipses Qadianis advance as the proof of their claim occurred on the 13th and 28th day of Ramadhan respectively! It is then obvious that Mirza Ghulam, as was his habit, purposely changed the quote (by adding the words "of its fixed nights") and twisted the true meaning of the hadith to lend appearance of legitimacy to his false claim. Furthermore, the hadith clearly states that this event has never occurred in the history, while the combination of eclipses on 13th and 28th of Ramadhan have occurred thousands of times throughout history.<br /><br />People must have really "shed tears" on the falsehood of Mirza Ghulam and the way "HMGA is building up a case" of a Liar Promised Messiah .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-38307640945025862202011-10-28T12:59:17.090+01:002011-10-28T12:59:17.090+01:00Findings,
I’m really sorry but I honestly think t...Findings,<br /><br />I’m really sorry but I honestly think that you have got the wrong end of the stick about this issue. <br /><br />In my previous post, I gave you a long excerpt from another part of HMGA’s writings, in which he clearly builds up this argument about the PM coming at the head of the century. In that excerpt, the authentic hadith that HMGA is referring to is clearly referenced and accepted. I think I also now accept your argument that HMGA is trying to make an argument from the hadith about the importance of the fourteenth century. Now what I am arguing for is that HMGA does not have to repeat the full argument every time he mentions this. What he has quoted in the paragraph under discussion is simply his conclusion-that from the hadith one can infer that the Messiah will come at the head of the century and will be the reformer of the fourteenth century. I’m not correcting his words at all, all I am saying is that when you look at his writings at a whole, and look at the excerpt above that I quoted, HMGA is building up a case. <br /><br />OK, I have had a look at that link that you sent me and read it in the orginal urdu text. HMGA has clearly mentioned the hadith he is referring to: ‘For the Mahdi, there will be two signs…’. So this is the hadith about the eclipses. Are you saying that this hadith does not exist? Also you say that this is a sahih hadith, but nowhere in the link does HMGA say such. He then goes to explain in detail why he thinks that the Messiah/Mahdi/Mujaddid is coming in the fourteenth century. I’m sorry but this link further supports my case that in the sentence under discussion, a cumulative case is being built up from both the hadith and the sahih hadith, that the Messiah will come in this way. You know, when these eclipses happened as per the hadith, many people accepted the truth of HMGA and shed tears, because they were already aware of this particular sign. <br /><br />If what you say about HMGA is correct, that he really did mean that there is a (or many) sahih hadith that specifically says that the Messiah will come at the start of the fourteenth century, then there are two reasons why I think this is not correct. Firstly, it would be really quite easy to go to the books of sahih hadith and disprove this point! Secondly, in the other explanatory passages, for example the excerpt I gave earlier and the link you provided in your reply, he would have made it more obvious. Yet what these passages show is that HMGA is building up a case and taking care to explain why he thinks this might be the conclusion of his argument. <br /><br />Finally, should I start calling you a plain and simple liar for attributing the words ‘sahih’ to the Darul Qutni reference, or the word ‘many’ to the head of the century reference?! I won’t and I will not use derogatory language to address you. Please, let’s just keep this discussion a bit more civilized and try and respect where each other might be coming from. <br /><br />Best wishes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-86288558456149241842011-10-28T06:41:12.681+01:002011-10-28T06:41:12.681+01:00Further to the above.. It's funny how propheci...Further to the above.. It's funny how prophecies and statements that your mirza made that turned out false are always justified by saying "he wanted to say something else" LOL.<br /><br />If he meant to say "we can infer...etc.." why didn't he just go ahead and say that? You don't need to correct the words of your prophet as I'm sure he knew better than you what he meant to say. After all he was the self styled Sultanul Qalam! Did the cat catch his tongue (pen) this time? <br /><br />Whichever way you want to try to spin it.. what mirza said is plainly false as you clearly attest.. there is NO sahih Hadith he lied and plain and simple.Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-56769673132620547052011-10-28T01:37:39.807+01:002011-10-28T01:37:39.807+01:00@ platosnores.. Thanks for your comment.. but your...@ platosnores.. Thanks for your comment.. but your analysis is wrong.. Mirza WAS talking about the messiah coming at the start of the 14th century. Check the reference below:<br /><br />"In a similar way there is a Sahi Hadith in ‘Darul Qutni’ which substantiate that the Mahdi and Masiah is going to come in the beginning of the 14th Century”<br />(Ruhani Khazain, Volume 17, ‘Tuhfa Golravea’, page 132; http://www.alislam.org/urdu/rk/Ruhani-Khazain-Vol-17.pdf, PDF 167)<br /><br />He also specifically mentions that this sahih Hadith is in 'Darul Qutni'.. I'm still waiting for the Hadith to materialise (hint- it doesn't exist).. but please pick up a copy of sunnan darul qutni and show me this sahih Hadith :-)Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-29933137175347830062011-10-28T01:03:09.533+01:002011-10-28T01:03:09.533+01:00Typo in first post-meant the not true head of cent...Typo in first post-meant the not true head of century.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-73753500705248021812011-10-28T01:00:35.831+01:002011-10-28T01:00:35.831+01:00“Among the arguments in decisive Hadith reports wh...“Among the arguments in decisive Hadith reports which confirm the authenticity<br />and truth of the claim of this writer is also the report regarding the appearance of <br />mujaddids which finds a place in Abu Daud and Mustadrik, i.e. for this Umma a<br /> mujaddid would appear at the head of every century, and would reform the faith <br />according to the needs of the Muslims. The words ‘he will reform for them’ in this <br />report show clearly that at the head of every century a mujaddid will come who will <br />reform the prevailing evils.<br /><br />Now when a fair-minded man ponders carefully as to what were the most dangerous evils <br />prevailing at the head of the fourteenth century, for whose reform the Mujaddid had to have<br /> the powers, then it is clearly found that the very great evil which destroyed hundreds of <br />thousands of people is the evil of the Christian preachers. No intelligent man and <br />sympathiser of Islam will deny that it should be the main duty of the Mujaddid of this <br />century to break the cross and destroy the arguments of the Christians. When the breaking<br /> of the cross is the duty and work of the Mujaddid of the fourteenth century, then it has to be <br />admitted that he himself is the Promised Messiah, for according to the Hadith reports it is<br /> also the sign of the Promised Messiah that he will be the Mujaddid of the century and his work<br /> would be to break the cross. In any case, if the present-day Muslim religious leaders reflect, <br />while adhering to honesty and religion, then they will most certainly have to admit that the <br />work of the Mujaddid of the fourteenth century is the breaking of the cross. And since this is <br />the work which is reserved for the Promised Messiah, hence it follows, of necessity, that the <br />Mujaddid of the fourteenth century must be the Promised Messiah.”<br /><br />So, what HMGA has done is used inference to further explain what he thinks has happened<br /> and to expand on the meaning of the hadith, in light of other prophecies regarding the coming <br />of the Messiah. To him, the PM would appear at the head of the century (because that's <br />when the hadith says mujaddids would appear), so it only seems natural to him that the<br /> PM would be such a reformer. Then he goes on to give his reasons as to why the PM would <br />be the reformer of the fourteenth century (but this is a separate sentence, and does not fall <br />under the hadith). HMGA is bringing together the various themes found in hadith and other <br />parts of Islamic theology. <br /><br />To put it in other words, all that HMGA wants to say is something like this 'Likewise, from the <br />Sahih hadith, we can say/infer that the Promised Messiah would come at the head of the century'. <br /><br />I suspect you will disagree but I hope that is at least an attempt at an explanation!<br /><br />Best wishes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-84805206802245019532011-10-28T00:59:20.277+01:002011-10-28T00:59:20.277+01:00Hello Findings,
I am writing as an independent Ah...Hello Findings,<br /><br />I am writing as an independent Ahmadi, trying to make sense of the passage that you have quoted. I know that you have a particular agenda in raising this issue, and so i suspect that what i say will not make any difference. But let's assume that you are genuinely interested in what Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad meant. <br /><br />However, i would like to make some preliminary comments (and once again i emphasise that these are my personal thoughts):<br /><br />1. There is no reference in the original Urdu text to the word 'many'. All that the original text says is that within the sahih hadith (plural), it is mentioned that the Promised Messiah (PM) will come at true head of the century. So, all an Ahmadi needs to show is one hadith (and in fact, that is all you have asked for). I am not sure where you have got that English translation from, but even if it is an Ahmadi translation, then it is wrong in this respect. <br />2. The bit about the fourteenth century is in another sentence. There is a full stop before and after it. If you read the sentences before, HMGA is giving one sign after another, and they are not necessarily connected. So, i believe that an Ahmadi does not have to show from this passage that there is a hadith with the words 'fourteenth century' in them. <br /><br />OK, now we come to the real question-what sahih hadith did HMGA have in mind when he made the statement that the PM will come at the head of the century. Well quite clearly the hadith about mujaddid coming at the head of each century and reforming the faith (which you have obviously come across before). Now i agree with you that there is no specific hadith that says that the PM will come at the head of the century. But i honestly don't think that HMGA is saying this. Why? Well, HMGA goes on in another part of his writing to explain this. He writes: (continued)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-23209890308514307642011-10-27T10:19:41.016+01:002011-10-27T10:19:41.016+01:00Khalid bin Waleed - Try to understand who are Muja...Khalid bin Waleed - Try to understand who are Mujaddid by reading this.<br /><br />http://maqasid.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/the-meaning-of-the-word-mujaddid-by-mufti-muhammad-taqi-usmani-2/<br /><br />Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was last Nabi and not Mujaddid. He did not do Tajdeed of Din but completed the Din. It was only MGAQ who claimed to be all in one. ALLAH communicates with Nabi and not Mujaddid. If someone like MGAQ claims to be a Mujaddid (no Mujaddid claims himself to be a Mujaddid) and then says angel Jibbrel or other angels are coming to him and communicate, be assured, he is a sick, liar and totally misled by Satan who is coming to him and whisper. MGAQ was same type of "mujaddid".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-83269084733813278152011-10-27T08:55:27.436+01:002011-10-27T08:55:27.436+01:00@ Anonymous I have a feeling English is not your f...@ Anonymous I have a feeling English is not your first language and so your reading comprehension skills may be lacking.<br /><br />Those quotes of so-called Hadith have never been quoted by Sunnis.. If they were the burden of proof is on you to show me. Regardless.. the challenge is simple I want someone to produce the Sahih Hadith your 'Prophet' spoke about. I'm still waiting.. It's gonna be 2 weeks soon.<br /><br />Also.. I've ALWAYS maintained I want a SAHIH Hadith as per the writings of your Mirza.. so please don't make crap up by saying I change my words.<br /><br />Now run along and try harder this time.. I'm sure you don't want to let down your 'Propet'. Find me just one of the many Sahih Hadith he claimed are out there. You don't want him to look like a liar now.. do you? :-)Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-65496480452277466282011-10-27T06:36:38.291+01:002011-10-27T06:36:38.291+01:00Those quotes of Hadith are not my own they are quo...Those quotes of Hadith are not my own they are quoted by Sunni ullemah and don't say they are liar as well. The problem with u are u don't want to lose like small kids and now u start crying. First u said sahih Hadith then u u've said any Hadith. Now u've got some and u don't want to accept so u just change ur words. Now tell me who is a liar mirza ghulam ahmed sahib, Sunni ullemah or u. Be realistic. Think before write something.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-38032106331622250962011-10-27T01:16:37.888+01:002011-10-27T01:16:37.888+01:00I've seen the link and it contains no sahih ha...I've seen the link and it contains no sahih hadith.. just the same old quotes that others have already sent it with no chain of narrators, no authors of the so-called books these quotes are meant to be from and no way to verify that these quotes (because they definitely aren't hadith) even exist.<br /><br />And please don't bring my personal hygiene into this.. just find me the sahih hadith please :)Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-90510018131615590092011-10-27T01:13:20.320+01:002011-10-27T01:13:20.320+01:00U know what u "stink"U know what u "stink"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-28034215279342632872011-10-27T01:11:33.625+01:002011-10-27T01:11:33.625+01:00Just see the linkJust see the linkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9104222902095833668.post-58300952045020244692011-10-27T00:57:26.363+01:002011-10-27T00:57:26.363+01:00@ Anonymous if there are soooo many of these hadit...@ Anonymous if there are soooo many of these hadith, then don't post some random link.. simply quote me the sahih hadith that proves your prophet didn't lie. How hard can it be.. I'm still waiting!Findingshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12838153918574723113noreply@blogger.com